Luchtmeetnet vs Website Carbon

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms80637
P95 · ms1926166
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no API keyFree keyless byte-based /data endpoint
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Luchtmeetnet vs Website Carbon: common questions

Which is more reliable, Luchtmeetnet or Website Carbon?

Both are neck-and-neck — Luchtmeetnet and Website Carbon each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Luchtmeetnet or Website Carbon?

Website Carbon has the lower median latency in our checks — Luchtmeetnet responds in 806 ms versus Website Carbon at 37 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Luchtmeetnet and Website Carbon need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Luchtmeetnet is callable with no signup, and Website Carbon is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Luchtmeetnet and Website Carbon from the browser?

Only Luchtmeetnet is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Website Carbon needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Luchtmeetnet and Website Carbon free for commercial use?

Luchtmeetnet has unclear commercial terms, and Website Carbon has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.