Lorem Picsum vs Shoof Aflam

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%99.02%
Uptime · 30d100%98.3%
P50 · ms193539
P95 · ms9041312
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseImages sourced from UnsplashUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Lorem Picsum vs Shoof Aflam: common questions

Which is more reliable, Lorem Picsum or Shoof Aflam?

On our scheduled checks, Lorem Picsum leads on measured uptime — Lorem Picsum at 100% versus Shoof Aflam at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Lorem Picsum or Shoof Aflam?

Lorem Picsum has the lower median latency in our checks — Lorem Picsum responds in 193 ms versus Shoof Aflam at 539 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Lorem Picsum and Shoof Aflam need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Lorem Picsum is callable with no signup, and Shoof Aflam is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Lorem Picsum and Shoof Aflam from the browser?

Only Lorem Picsum is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Shoof Aflam needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Lorem Picsum and Shoof Aflam free for commercial use?

Lorem Picsum has unclear commercial terms, and Shoof Aflam has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.