Logotypes vs ScrapingDog

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d47.8%100%
Uptime · 30d0.0%100%
P50 · ms3645127
P95 · ms4993526
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Logotypes vs ScrapingDog: common questions

Which is more reliable, Logotypes or ScrapingDog?

On our scheduled checks, ScrapingDog leads on measured uptime — Logotypes at 47.8% versus ScrapingDog at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Logotypes or ScrapingDog?

ScrapingDog has the lower median latency in our checks — Logotypes responds in 3645 ms versus ScrapingDog at 127 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Logotypes and ScrapingDog need an API key?

Logotypes needs no key, while ScrapingDog requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Logotypes first.

Can I call Logotypes and ScrapingDog from the browser?

Only ScrapingDog is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Logotypes needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Logotypes and ScrapingDog free for commercial use?

Logotypes has unclear commercial terms, and ScrapingDog has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.