Lichess vs PotterDB
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Lichess vs PotterDB: common questions
Which is more reliable, Lichess or PotterDB?
On our scheduled checks, PotterDB leads on measured uptime — Lichess at 99.02% versus PotterDB at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Lichess or PotterDB?
Lichess has the lower median latency in our checks — Lichess responds in 436 ms versus PotterDB at 525 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Lichess and PotterDB need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — Lichess is callable with no signup, and PotterDB is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call Lichess and PotterDB from the browser?
Yes — both Lichess and PotterDB send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are Lichess and PotterDB free for commercial use?
Lichess has unclear commercial terms, and PotterDB has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.