Lichess vs Monster Hunter World

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%97.1%
Uptime · 30d100%95.0%
P50 · ms436962
P95 · ms40883049
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified; game content © Capcom
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree, no API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Lichess vs Monster Hunter World: common questions

Which is more reliable, Lichess or Monster Hunter World?

On our scheduled checks, Lichess leads on measured uptime — Lichess at 99.02% versus Monster Hunter World at 97.1% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Lichess or Monster Hunter World?

Lichess has the lower median latency in our checks — Lichess responds in 436 ms versus Monster Hunter World at 962 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Lichess and Monster Hunter World need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Lichess is callable with no signup, and Monster Hunter World is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Lichess and Monster Hunter World from the browser?

Yes — both Lichess and Monster Hunter World send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Lichess and Monster Hunter World free for commercial use?

Lichess has unclear commercial terms, and Monster Hunter World has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.