Lexigram vs Oddsmagnet

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%100%
Uptime · 30d98.3%100%
P50 · ms807672
P95 · ms16721310
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Lexigram vs Oddsmagnet: common questions

Which is more reliable, Lexigram or Oddsmagnet?

On our scheduled checks, Oddsmagnet leads on measured uptime — Lexigram at 99.02% versus Oddsmagnet at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Lexigram or Oddsmagnet?

Oddsmagnet has the lower median latency in our checks — Lexigram responds in 807 ms versus Oddsmagnet at 672 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Lexigram and Oddsmagnet need an API key?

Oddsmagnet needs no key, while Lexigram requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Oddsmagnet first.

Can I call Lexigram and Oddsmagnet from the browser?

Only Oddsmagnet is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Lexigram needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Lexigram and Oddsmagnet free for commercial use?

Lexigram has unclear commercial terms, and Oddsmagnet has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.