shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Lexigram vs Longevity World Cup

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APILexigramHEALTHY93Longevity World CupHEALTHY86
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.44%98.9%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms414590
P95 · ms13803677
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree — no key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Lexigram vs Longevity World Cup: common questions

Which is more reliable, Lexigram or Longevity World Cup?

On our scheduled checks, Lexigram leads on measured uptime — Lexigram at 99.44% versus Longevity World Cup at 98.9% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Lexigram or Longevity World Cup?

Lexigram has the lower median latency in our checks — Lexigram responds in 414 ms versus Longevity World Cup at 590 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Lexigram and Longevity World Cup need an API key?

Longevity World Cup needs no key, while Lexigram requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Longevity World Cup first.

Can I call Lexigram and Longevity World Cup from the browser?

Only Longevity World Cup is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Lexigram needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Lexigram and Longevity World Cup free for commercial use?

Lexigram has unclear commercial terms, and Longevity World Cup has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.