LectServe vs Remotive

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms786612
P95 · ms16332572
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSnoyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

LectServe vs Remotive: common questions

Which is more reliable, LectServe or Remotive?

On our scheduled checks, Remotive leads on measured uptime — LectServe at 99.02% versus Remotive at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, LectServe or Remotive?

Remotive has the lower median latency in our checks — LectServe responds in 786 ms versus Remotive at 612 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do LectServe and Remotive need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — LectServe is callable with no signup, and Remotive is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call LectServe and Remotive from the browser?

Only Remotive is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. LectServe needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are LectServe and Remotive free for commercial use?

LectServe has unclear commercial terms, and Remotive has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.