LCBO vs SportScore

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%88.2%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms205127
P95 · ms5332112
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — no key (attribution tier)
Rate limit60 req/window · 59 remaining · resets 60Retry-After: 5s
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

LCBO vs SportScore: common questions

Which is more reliable, LCBO or SportScore?

On our scheduled checks, LCBO leads on measured uptime — LCBO at 100% versus SportScore at 88.2% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, LCBO or SportScore?

SportScore has the lower median latency in our checks — LCBO responds in 205 ms versus SportScore at 127 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do LCBO and SportScore need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — LCBO is callable with no signup, and SportScore is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call LCBO and SportScore from the browser?

Only SportScore is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. LCBO needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are LCBO and SportScore free for commercial use?

LCBO has unclear commercial terms, and SportScore has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.