LCBO vs Open Food Facts

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%39.2%
Uptime · 30d100%33.3%
P50 · ms2071556
P95 · ms4292836
Authnonenone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limit60 req/window · 59 remaining · resets 60Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

LCBO vs Open Food Facts: common questions

Which is more reliable, LCBO or Open Food Facts?

On our scheduled checks, LCBO leads on measured uptime — LCBO at 100% versus Open Food Facts at 39.2% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, LCBO or Open Food Facts?

LCBO has the lower median latency in our checks — LCBO responds in 207 ms versus Open Food Facts at 1556 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do LCBO and Open Food Facts need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — LCBO is callable with no signup, and Open Food Facts is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call LCBO and Open Food Facts from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call LCBO and Open Food Facts from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are LCBO and Open Food Facts free for commercial use?

LCBO has unclear commercial terms, and Open Food Facts has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.