LatLng vs ViaCep
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
LatLng vs ViaCep: common questions
Which is more reliable, LatLng or ViaCep?
On our scheduled checks, LatLng leads on measured uptime — LatLng at 100% versus ViaCep at 98.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, LatLng or ViaCep?
ViaCep has the lower median latency in our checks — LatLng responds in 855 ms versus ViaCep at 651 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do LatLng and ViaCep need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — LatLng is callable with no signup, and ViaCep is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call LatLng and ViaCep from the browser?
Yes — both LatLng and ViaCep send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are LatLng and ViaCep free for commercial use?
LatLng has unclear commercial terms, and ViaCep has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.