LatLng vs SLF
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
LatLng vs SLF: common questions
Which is more reliable, LatLng or SLF?
Both are neck-and-neck — LatLng and SLF each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.
Which is faster, LatLng or SLF?
SLF has the lower median latency in our checks — LatLng responds in 855 ms versus SLF at 213 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do LatLng and SLF need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — LatLng is callable with no signup, and SLF is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call LatLng and SLF from the browser?
Yes — both LatLng and SLF send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are LatLng and SLF free for commercial use?
LatLng has unclear commercial terms, and SLF has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.