Landing.jobs vs Remotive
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Landing.jobs vs Remotive: common questions
Which is more reliable, Landing.jobs or Remotive?
Both are neck-and-neck — Landing.jobs and Remotive each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.
Which is faster, Landing.jobs or Remotive?
Remotive has the lower median latency in our checks — Landing.jobs responds in 645 ms versus Remotive at 612 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Landing.jobs and Remotive need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — Landing.jobs is callable with no signup, and Remotive is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call Landing.jobs and Remotive from the browser?
Yes — both Landing.jobs and Remotive send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are Landing.jobs and Remotive free for commercial use?
Landing.jobs has unclear commercial terms, and Remotive has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.