Landing.jobs vs Nager.Date
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Landing.jobs vs Nager.Date: common questions
Which is more reliable, Landing.jobs or Nager.Date?
Both are neck-and-neck — Landing.jobs and Nager.Date each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.
Which is faster, Landing.jobs or Nager.Date?
Nager.Date has the lower median latency in our checks — Landing.jobs responds in 645 ms versus Nager.Date at 56 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Landing.jobs and Nager.Date need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — Landing.jobs is callable with no signup, and Nager.Date is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call Landing.jobs and Nager.Date from the browser?
Yes — both Landing.jobs and Nager.Date send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are Landing.jobs and Nager.Date free for commercial use?
Landing.jobs has unclear commercial terms, and Nager.Date has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.