Landing.jobs vs MailCheck.ai
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Landing.jobs vs MailCheck.ai: common questions
Which is more reliable, Landing.jobs or MailCheck.ai?
On our scheduled checks, Landing.jobs leads on measured uptime — Landing.jobs at 100% versus MailCheck.ai at 93.1% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Landing.jobs or MailCheck.ai?
MailCheck.ai has the lower median latency in our checks — Landing.jobs responds in 645 ms versus MailCheck.ai at 272 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Landing.jobs and MailCheck.ai need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — Landing.jobs is callable with no signup, and MailCheck.ai is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call Landing.jobs and MailCheck.ai from the browser?
Yes — both Landing.jobs and MailCheck.ai send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are Landing.jobs and MailCheck.ai free for commercial use?
Landing.jobs has unclear commercial terms, and MailCheck.ai has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.