Landing.jobs vs mail.tm
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Landing.jobs vs mail.tm: common questions
Which is more reliable, Landing.jobs or mail.tm?
On our scheduled checks, Landing.jobs leads on measured uptime — Landing.jobs at 100% versus mail.tm at 84.3% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Landing.jobs or mail.tm?
Landing.jobs has the lower median latency in our checks — Landing.jobs responds in 645 ms versus mail.tm at 709 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Landing.jobs and mail.tm need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — Landing.jobs is callable with no signup, and mail.tm is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call Landing.jobs and mail.tm from the browser?
Only Landing.jobs is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. mail.tm needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are Landing.jobs and mail.tm free for commercial use?
Landing.jobs has unclear commercial terms, and mail.tm has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.