shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Landing.jobs vs Magic 8-Ball API

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APILanding.jobsHEALTHY91Magic 8-Ball APIHEALTHY95
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms645442
P95 · ms42351134
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Landing.jobs vs Magic 8-Ball API: common questions

Which is more reliable, Landing.jobs or Magic 8-Ball API?

Both are neck-and-neck — Landing.jobs and Magic 8-Ball API each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Landing.jobs or Magic 8-Ball API?

Magic 8-Ball API has the lower median latency in our checks — Landing.jobs responds in 645 ms versus Magic 8-Ball API at 442 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Landing.jobs and Magic 8-Ball API need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Landing.jobs is callable with no signup, and Magic 8-Ball API is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Landing.jobs and Magic 8-Ball API from the browser?

Only Landing.jobs is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Magic 8-Ball API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Landing.jobs and Magic 8-Ball API free for commercial use?

Landing.jobs has unclear commercial terms, and Magic 8-Ball API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.