Kroki vs ReportForge

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms6331362
P95 · ms31832016
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Kroki vs ReportForge: common questions

Which is more reliable, Kroki or ReportForge?

Both are neck-and-neck — Kroki and ReportForge each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Kroki or ReportForge?

Kroki has the lower median latency in our checks — Kroki responds in 633 ms versus ReportForge at 1362 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Kroki and ReportForge need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Kroki is callable with no signup, and ReportForge is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Kroki and ReportForge from the browser?

Only Kroki is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. ReportForge needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Kroki and ReportForge free for commercial use?

Kroki has unclear commercial terms, and ReportForge has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.