Kitsu vs Nekosia API

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%98.0%
Uptime · 30d100%98.3%
P50 · ms268584
P95 · ms9701135
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Kitsu vs Nekosia API: common questions

Which is more reliable, Kitsu or Nekosia API?

On our scheduled checks, Kitsu leads on measured uptime — Kitsu at 100% versus Nekosia API at 98.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Kitsu or Nekosia API?

Kitsu has the lower median latency in our checks — Kitsu responds in 268 ms versus Nekosia API at 584 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Kitsu and Nekosia API need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Kitsu is callable with no signup, and Nekosia API is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Kitsu and Nekosia API from the browser?

Yes — both Kitsu and Nekosia API send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Kitsu and Nekosia API free for commercial use?

Kitsu has unclear commercial terms, and Nekosia API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.