Kickbox vs Nager.Date

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms59258
P95 · ms3630553
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — open disposable-address checkFree, no key
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Kickbox vs Nager.Date: common questions

Which is more reliable, Kickbox or Nager.Date?

Both are neck-and-neck — Kickbox and Nager.Date each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Kickbox or Nager.Date?

Nager.Date has the lower median latency in our checks — Kickbox responds in 592 ms versus Nager.Date at 58 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Kickbox and Nager.Date need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Kickbox is callable with no signup, and Nager.Date is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Kickbox and Nager.Date from the browser?

Yes — both Kickbox and Nager.Date send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Kickbox and Nager.Date free for commercial use?

Kickbox has unclear commercial terms, and Nager.Date has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.