JPL Close Approach vs Stock Sentiment API
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
JPL Close Approach vs Stock Sentiment API: common questions
Which is more reliable, JPL Close Approach or Stock Sentiment API?
On our scheduled checks, Stock Sentiment API leads on measured uptime — JPL Close Approach at 98.0% versus Stock Sentiment API at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, JPL Close Approach or Stock Sentiment API?
Stock Sentiment API has the lower median latency in our checks — JPL Close Approach responds in 676 ms versus Stock Sentiment API at 531 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do JPL Close Approach and Stock Sentiment API need an API key?
JPL Close Approach needs no key, while Stock Sentiment API requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for JPL Close Approach first.
Can I call JPL Close Approach and Stock Sentiment API from the browser?
Only Stock Sentiment API is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. JPL Close Approach needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are JPL Close Approach and Stock Sentiment API free for commercial use?
JPL Close Approach has unclear commercial terms, and Stock Sentiment API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.