shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

JPL Close Approach vs MediaCraft AI

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIJPL Close ApproachNEW—MediaCraft AINEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

JPL Close Approach vs MediaCraft AI: common questions

Which is more reliable, JPL Close Approach or MediaCraft AI?

On our scheduled checks, MediaCraft AI leads on measured uptime — JPL Close Approach at —% versus MediaCraft AI at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do JPL Close Approach and MediaCraft AI need an API key?

JPL Close Approach needs no key, while MediaCraft AI requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for JPL Close Approach first.

Can I call JPL Close Approach and MediaCraft AI from the browser?

Only MediaCraft AI is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. JPL Close Approach needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are JPL Close Approach and MediaCraft AI free for commercial use?

JPL Close Approach has unclear commercial terms, and MediaCraft AI has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.