JPL Close Approach vs Keen IO

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms
P95 · ms
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

JPL Close Approach vs Keen IO: common questions

Which is more reliable, JPL Close Approach or Keen IO?

On our scheduled checks, Keen IO leads on measured uptime — JPL Close Approach at —% versus Keen IO at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do JPL Close Approach and Keen IO need an API key?

JPL Close Approach needs no key, while Keen IO requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for JPL Close Approach first.

Can I call JPL Close Approach and Keen IO from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call JPL Close Approach and Keen IO from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are JPL Close Approach and Keen IO free for commercial use?

JPL Close Approach has unclear commercial terms, and Keen IO has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.