Jobvetta vs Nager.Date

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms8556
P95 · ms215553
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree, no key
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-252026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Jobvetta vs Nager.Date: common questions

Which is more reliable, Jobvetta or Nager.Date?

Both are neck-and-neck — Jobvetta and Nager.Date each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Jobvetta or Nager.Date?

Nager.Date has the lower median latency in our checks — Jobvetta responds in 85 ms versus Nager.Date at 56 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Jobvetta and Nager.Date need an API key?

Nager.Date needs no key, while Jobvetta requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Nager.Date first.

Can I call Jobvetta and Nager.Date from the browser?

Yes — both Jobvetta and Nager.Date send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Jobvetta and Nager.Date free for commercial use?

Jobvetta has unclear commercial terms, and Nager.Date has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.