Jobicy vs Landing.jobs
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Jobicy vs Landing.jobs: common questions
Which is more reliable, Jobicy or Landing.jobs?
On our scheduled checks, Landing.jobs leads on measured uptime — Jobicy at 99.02% versus Landing.jobs at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Jobicy or Landing.jobs?
Jobicy has the lower median latency in our checks — Jobicy responds in 629 ms versus Landing.jobs at 645 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Jobicy and Landing.jobs need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — Jobicy is callable with no signup, and Landing.jobs is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call Jobicy and Landing.jobs from the browser?
Yes — both Jobicy and Landing.jobs send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are Jobicy and Landing.jobs free for commercial use?
Jobicy has unclear commercial terms, and Landing.jobs has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.