shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Jina AI vs SHARE

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIJina AIHEALTHY91SHAREHEALTHY96
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%98.9%
Uptime · 30d100%96.6%
P50 · ms165261
P95 · ms9813119
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key may be required for productionFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Jina AI vs SHARE: common questions

Which is more reliable, Jina AI or SHARE?

On our scheduled checks, Jina AI leads on measured uptime — Jina AI at 100% versus SHARE at 98.9% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Jina AI or SHARE?

Jina AI has the lower median latency in our checks — Jina AI responds in 165 ms versus SHARE at 261 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Jina AI and SHARE need an API key?

SHARE needs no key, while Jina AI requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for SHARE first.

Can I call Jina AI and SHARE from the browser?

Yes — both Jina AI and SHARE send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Jina AI and SHARE free for commercial use?

Jina AI has unclear commercial terms, and SHARE has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.