Jina AI vs Keen IO

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms255667
P95 · ms9811461
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key may be required for productionFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Jina AI vs Keen IO: common questions

Which is more reliable, Jina AI or Keen IO?

Both are neck-and-neck — Jina AI and Keen IO each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Jina AI or Keen IO?

Jina AI has the lower median latency in our checks — Jina AI responds in 255 ms versus Keen IO at 667 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Jina AI and Keen IO need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — Jina AI uses an API key and Keen IO uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call Jina AI and Keen IO from the browser?

Only Jina AI is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Keen IO needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Jina AI and Keen IO free for commercial use?

Jina AI has unclear commercial terms, and Keen IO has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.