iTunes vs Sofiaplan

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d68.6%100%
Uptime · 30d46.7%100%
P50 · ms5781666
P95 · ms14263475
Authnonenone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

iTunes vs Sofiaplan: common questions

Which is more reliable, iTunes or Sofiaplan?

On our scheduled checks, Sofiaplan leads on measured uptime — iTunes at 68.6% versus Sofiaplan at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, iTunes or Sofiaplan?

iTunes has the lower median latency in our checks — iTunes responds in 578 ms versus Sofiaplan at 1666 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do iTunes and Sofiaplan need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — iTunes is callable with no signup, and Sofiaplan is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call iTunes and Sofiaplan from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call iTunes and Sofiaplan from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are iTunes and Sofiaplan free for commercial use?

iTunes has unclear commercial terms, and Sofiaplan has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.