iTunes vs RuntimeBuzz Article API
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
iTunes vs RuntimeBuzz Article API: common questions
Which is more reliable, iTunes or RuntimeBuzz Article API?
On our scheduled checks, RuntimeBuzz Article API leads on measured uptime — iTunes at 68.6% versus RuntimeBuzz Article API at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, iTunes or RuntimeBuzz Article API?
RuntimeBuzz Article API has the lower median latency in our checks — iTunes responds in 578 ms versus RuntimeBuzz Article API at 539 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do iTunes and RuntimeBuzz Article API need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — iTunes is callable with no signup, and RuntimeBuzz Article API is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call iTunes and RuntimeBuzz Article API from the browser?
Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call iTunes and RuntimeBuzz Article API from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.
Are iTunes and RuntimeBuzz Article API free for commercial use?
iTunes has unclear commercial terms, and RuntimeBuzz Article API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.