iTunes vs Open Data Minneapolis

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d68.6%99.02%
Uptime · 30d46.7%98.3%
P50 · ms578817
P95 · ms14263677
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

iTunes vs Open Data Minneapolis: common questions

Which is more reliable, iTunes or Open Data Minneapolis?

On our scheduled checks, Open Data Minneapolis leads on measured uptime — iTunes at 68.6% versus Open Data Minneapolis at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, iTunes or Open Data Minneapolis?

iTunes has the lower median latency in our checks — iTunes responds in 578 ms versus Open Data Minneapolis at 817 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do iTunes and Open Data Minneapolis need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — iTunes is callable with no signup, and Open Data Minneapolis is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call iTunes and Open Data Minneapolis from the browser?

Only Open Data Minneapolis is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. iTunes needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are iTunes and Open Data Minneapolis free for commercial use?

iTunes has unclear commercial terms, and Open Data Minneapolis has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.