iTunes Search vs Wallhaven

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d5.9%82.4%
Uptime · 30d5.0%71.7%
P50 · ms233625
P95 · ms2933981
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitRetry-After: 29s45 req/window · 44 remaining
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

iTunes Search vs Wallhaven: common questions

Which is more reliable, iTunes Search or Wallhaven?

On our scheduled checks, Wallhaven leads on measured uptime — iTunes Search at 5.9% versus Wallhaven at 82.4% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, iTunes Search or Wallhaven?

iTunes Search has the lower median latency in our checks — iTunes Search responds in 233 ms versus Wallhaven at 625 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do iTunes Search and Wallhaven need an API key?

iTunes Search needs no key, while Wallhaven requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for iTunes Search first.

Can I call iTunes Search and Wallhaven from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call iTunes Search and Wallhaven from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are iTunes Search and Wallhaven free for commercial use?

iTunes Search has unclear commercial terms, and Wallhaven has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.