ItsThisForThat vs ScreenshotOne.com

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%99.02%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms242340
P95 · ms555843
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublished (docs ask you not to hammer it)Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

ItsThisForThat vs ScreenshotOne.com: common questions

Which is more reliable, ItsThisForThat or ScreenshotOne.com?

On our scheduled checks, ItsThisForThat leads on measured uptime — ItsThisForThat at 100% versus ScreenshotOne.com at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, ItsThisForThat or ScreenshotOne.com?

ItsThisForThat has the lower median latency in our checks — ItsThisForThat responds in 242 ms versus ScreenshotOne.com at 340 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do ItsThisForThat and ScreenshotOne.com need an API key?

ItsThisForThat needs no key, while ScreenshotOne.com requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for ItsThisForThat first.

Can I call ItsThisForThat and ScreenshotOne.com from the browser?

Only ScreenshotOne.com is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. ItsThisForThat needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are ItsThisForThat and ScreenshotOne.com free for commercial use?

ItsThisForThat has unclear commercial terms, and ScreenshotOne.com has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.