ItsThisForThat vs QR & Barcode

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms242722
P95 · ms5551344
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished (docs ask you not to hammer it)Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

ItsThisForThat vs QR & Barcode: common questions

Which is more reliable, ItsThisForThat or QR & Barcode?

Both are neck-and-neck — ItsThisForThat and QR & Barcode each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, ItsThisForThat or QR & Barcode?

ItsThisForThat has the lower median latency in our checks — ItsThisForThat responds in 242 ms versus QR & Barcode at 722 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do ItsThisForThat and QR & Barcode need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — ItsThisForThat is callable with no signup, and QR & Barcode is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call ItsThisForThat and QR & Barcode from the browser?

Only QR & Barcode is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. ItsThisForThat needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are ItsThisForThat and QR & Barcode free for commercial use?

ItsThisForThat has unclear commercial terms, and QR & Barcode has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.