ItsThisForThat vs Passantenfrequenzen Zürich
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
ItsThisForThat vs Passantenfrequenzen Zürich: common questions
Which is more reliable, ItsThisForThat or Passantenfrequenzen Zürich?
Both are neck-and-neck — ItsThisForThat and Passantenfrequenzen Zürich each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.
Which is faster, ItsThisForThat or Passantenfrequenzen Zürich?
ItsThisForThat has the lower median latency in our checks — ItsThisForThat responds in 242 ms versus Passantenfrequenzen Zürich at 569 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do ItsThisForThat and Passantenfrequenzen Zürich need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — ItsThisForThat is callable with no signup, and Passantenfrequenzen Zürich is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call ItsThisForThat and Passantenfrequenzen Zürich from the browser?
Only Passantenfrequenzen Zürich is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. ItsThisForThat needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are ItsThisForThat and Passantenfrequenzen Zürich free for commercial use?
ItsThisForThat has unclear commercial terms, and Passantenfrequenzen Zürich has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.