ItsThisForThat vs Logotypes

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%82.4%
Uptime · 30d100%76.7%
P50 · ms2423861
P95 · ms5554993
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished (docs ask you not to hammer it)Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

ItsThisForThat vs Logotypes: common questions

Which is more reliable, ItsThisForThat or Logotypes?

On our scheduled checks, ItsThisForThat leads on measured uptime — ItsThisForThat at 100% versus Logotypes at 82.4% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, ItsThisForThat or Logotypes?

ItsThisForThat has the lower median latency in our checks — ItsThisForThat responds in 242 ms versus Logotypes at 3861 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do ItsThisForThat and Logotypes need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — ItsThisForThat is callable with no signup, and Logotypes is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call ItsThisForThat and Logotypes from the browser?

Only Logotypes is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. ItsThisForThat needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are ItsThisForThat and Logotypes free for commercial use?

ItsThisForThat has unclear commercial terms, and Logotypes has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.