ItsThisForThat vs 24 Pull Requests

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms
P95 · ms
Authnonenone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished (docs ask you not to hammer it)Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

ItsThisForThat vs 24 Pull Requests: common questions

Which is more reliable, ItsThisForThat or 24 Pull Requests?

On our scheduled checks, 24 Pull Requests leads on measured uptime — ItsThisForThat at —% versus 24 Pull Requests at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do ItsThisForThat and 24 Pull Requests need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — ItsThisForThat is callable with no signup, and 24 Pull Requests is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call ItsThisForThat and 24 Pull Requests from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call ItsThisForThat and 24 Pull Requests from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are ItsThisForThat and 24 Pull Requests free for commercial use?

ItsThisForThat has unclear commercial terms, and 24 Pull Requests has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.