ISRO vs USGS Earthquake Hazards Program
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
ISRO vs USGS Earthquake Hazards Program: common questions
Which is more reliable, ISRO or USGS Earthquake Hazards Program?
On our scheduled checks, ISRO leads on measured uptime — ISRO at 100% versus USGS Earthquake Hazards Program at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, ISRO or USGS Earthquake Hazards Program?
ISRO has the lower median latency in our checks — ISRO responds in 369 ms versus USGS Earthquake Hazards Program at 549 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do ISRO and USGS Earthquake Hazards Program need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — ISRO is callable with no signup, and USGS Earthquake Hazards Program is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call ISRO and USGS Earthquake Hazards Program from the browser?
Yes — both ISRO and USGS Earthquake Hazards Program send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are ISRO and USGS Earthquake Hazards Program free for commercial use?
ISRO has unclear commercial terms, and USGS Earthquake Hazards Program allows commercial use on its free tier. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.