ISRO vs Open Science Framework
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
ISRO vs Open Science Framework: common questions
Which is more reliable, ISRO or Open Science Framework?
On our scheduled checks, ISRO leads on measured uptime — ISRO at 100% versus Open Science Framework at 97.1% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, ISRO or Open Science Framework?
ISRO has the lower median latency in our checks — ISRO responds in 369 ms versus Open Science Framework at 952 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do ISRO and Open Science Framework need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — ISRO is callable with no signup, and Open Science Framework is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call ISRO and Open Science Framework from the browser?
Only ISRO is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Open Science Framework needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are ISRO and Open Science Framework free for commercial use?
ISRO has unclear commercial terms, and Open Science Framework has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.