ISO 3166-2 API vs Rwanda Locations
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
ISO 3166-2 API vs Rwanda Locations: common questions
Which is more reliable, ISO 3166-2 API or Rwanda Locations?
Both are neck-and-neck — ISO 3166-2 API and Rwanda Locations each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.
Which is faster, ISO 3166-2 API or Rwanda Locations?
Rwanda Locations has the lower median latency in our checks — ISO 3166-2 API responds in 1056 ms versus Rwanda Locations at 195 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do ISO 3166-2 API and Rwanda Locations need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — ISO 3166-2 API is callable with no signup, and Rwanda Locations is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call ISO 3166-2 API and Rwanda Locations from the browser?
Only ISO 3166-2 API is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Rwanda Locations needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are ISO 3166-2 API and Rwanda Locations free for commercial use?
ISO 3166-2 API has unclear commercial terms, and Rwanda Locations has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.