ISO 3166-2 API vs GeoJS

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms
P95 · ms
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree, no API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished (no enforced limit stated)
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

ISO 3166-2 API vs GeoJS: common questions

Which is more reliable, ISO 3166-2 API or GeoJS?

On our scheduled checks, GeoJS leads on measured uptime — ISO 3166-2 API at —% versus GeoJS at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do ISO 3166-2 API and GeoJS need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — ISO 3166-2 API is callable with no signup, and GeoJS is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call ISO 3166-2 API and GeoJS from the browser?

Only GeoJS is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. ISO 3166-2 API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are ISO 3166-2 API and GeoJS free for commercial use?

ISO 3166-2 API has unclear commercial terms, and GeoJS has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.