IPWhois vs Rwanda Locations

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms23195
P95 · ms5983373
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesno
HTTPSnoyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key may be required for productionFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

IPWhois vs Rwanda Locations: common questions

Which is more reliable, IPWhois or Rwanda Locations?

Both are neck-and-neck — IPWhois and Rwanda Locations each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, IPWhois or Rwanda Locations?

IPWhois has the lower median latency in our checks — IPWhois responds in 23 ms versus Rwanda Locations at 195 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do IPWhois and Rwanda Locations need an API key?

Rwanda Locations needs no key, while IPWhois requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Rwanda Locations first.

Can I call IPWhois and Rwanda Locations from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call IPWhois and Rwanda Locations from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are IPWhois and Rwanda Locations free for commercial use?

IPWhois has unclear commercial terms, and Rwanda Locations has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.