IPGEO vs Rwanda Locations

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%100%
Uptime · 30d98.3%100%
P50 · ms266195
P95 · ms20833373
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

IPGEO vs Rwanda Locations: common questions

Which is more reliable, IPGEO or Rwanda Locations?

On our scheduled checks, Rwanda Locations leads on measured uptime — IPGEO at 99.02% versus Rwanda Locations at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, IPGEO or Rwanda Locations?

Rwanda Locations has the lower median latency in our checks — IPGEO responds in 266 ms versus Rwanda Locations at 195 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do IPGEO and Rwanda Locations need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — IPGEO is callable with no signup, and Rwanda Locations is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call IPGEO and Rwanda Locations from the browser?

Only IPGEO is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Rwanda Locations needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are IPGEO and Rwanda Locations free for commercial use?

IPGEO has unclear commercial terms, and Rwanda Locations has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.