ipapi.co vs ISO 3166-2 API
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
ipapi.co vs ISO 3166-2 API: common questions
Which is more reliable, ipapi.co or ISO 3166-2 API?
On our scheduled checks, ISO 3166-2 API leads on measured uptime — ipapi.co at 1.0% versus ISO 3166-2 API at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, ipapi.co or ISO 3166-2 API?
ipapi.co has the lower median latency in our checks — ipapi.co responds in 440 ms versus ISO 3166-2 API at 1056 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do ipapi.co and ISO 3166-2 API need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — ipapi.co is callable with no signup, and ISO 3166-2 API is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call ipapi.co and ISO 3166-2 API from the browser?
Yes — both ipapi.co and ISO 3166-2 API send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are ipapi.co and ISO 3166-2 API free for commercial use?
ipapi.co has unclear commercial terms, and ISO 3166-2 API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.