IP2Location vs Rwanda Locations

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms131195
P95 · ms6773373
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

IP2Location vs Rwanda Locations: common questions

Which is more reliable, IP2Location or Rwanda Locations?

Both are neck-and-neck — IP2Location and Rwanda Locations each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, IP2Location or Rwanda Locations?

IP2Location has the lower median latency in our checks — IP2Location responds in 131 ms versus Rwanda Locations at 195 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do IP2Location and Rwanda Locations need an API key?

Rwanda Locations needs no key, while IP2Location requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Rwanda Locations first.

Can I call IP2Location and Rwanda Locations from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call IP2Location and Rwanda Locations from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are IP2Location and Rwanda Locations free for commercial use?

IP2Location has unclear commercial terms, and Rwanda Locations has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.