IP Geolocation API vs OpenSanctions
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
IP Geolocation API vs OpenSanctions: common questions
Which is more reliable, IP Geolocation API or OpenSanctions?
On our scheduled checks, OpenSanctions leads on measured uptime — IP Geolocation API at 94.1% versus OpenSanctions at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, IP Geolocation API or OpenSanctions?
IP Geolocation API has the lower median latency in our checks — IP Geolocation API responds in 257 ms versus OpenSanctions at 387 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do IP Geolocation API and OpenSanctions need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — IP Geolocation API is callable with no signup, and OpenSanctions is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call IP Geolocation API and OpenSanctions from the browser?
Only OpenSanctions is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. IP Geolocation API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are IP Geolocation API and OpenSanctions free for commercial use?
IP Geolocation API has unclear commercial terms, and OpenSanctions has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.