ip.app vs Zippopotam.us
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
ip.app vs Zippopotam.us: common questions
Which is more reliable, ip.app or Zippopotam.us?
Both are neck-and-neck — ip.app and Zippopotam.us each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.
Which is faster, ip.app or Zippopotam.us?
ip.app has the lower median latency in our checks — ip.app responds in 76 ms versus Zippopotam.us at 219 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do ip.app and Zippopotam.us need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — ip.app is callable with no signup, and Zippopotam.us is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call ip.app and Zippopotam.us from the browser?
Yes — both ip.app and Zippopotam.us send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are ip.app and Zippopotam.us free for commercial use?
ip.app has unclear commercial terms, and Zippopotam.us has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.