shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

ip.app vs Rwanda Locations

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIip.appHEALTHY100Rwanda LocationsHEALTHY98
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms76195
P95 · ms2763373
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

ip.app vs Rwanda Locations: common questions

Which is more reliable, ip.app or Rwanda Locations?

Both are neck-and-neck — ip.app and Rwanda Locations each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, ip.app or Rwanda Locations?

ip.app has the lower median latency in our checks — ip.app responds in 76 ms versus Rwanda Locations at 195 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do ip.app and Rwanda Locations need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — ip.app is callable with no signup, and Rwanda Locations is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call ip.app and Rwanda Locations from the browser?

Only ip.app is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Rwanda Locations needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are ip.app and Rwanda Locations free for commercial use?

ip.app has unclear commercial terms, and Rwanda Locations has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.