Imgur vs Musixmatch

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms863559
P95 · ms38461486
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Imgur vs Musixmatch: common questions

Which is more reliable, Imgur or Musixmatch?

Both are neck-and-neck — Imgur and Musixmatch each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Imgur or Musixmatch?

Musixmatch has the lower median latency in our checks — Imgur responds in 863 ms versus Musixmatch at 559 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Imgur and Musixmatch need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — Imgur uses an API key and Musixmatch uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call Imgur and Musixmatch from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Imgur and Musixmatch from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Imgur and Musixmatch free for commercial use?

Imgur has unclear commercial terms, and Musixmatch has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.