Imgur vs MCU Countdown

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%98.9%
Uptime · 30d100%96.6%
P50 · ms412388
P95 · ms38464403
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified (movie data from TMDB)
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Imgur vs MCU Countdown: common questions

Which is more reliable, Imgur or MCU Countdown?

On our scheduled checks, Imgur leads on measured uptime — Imgur at 100% versus MCU Countdown at 98.9% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Imgur or MCU Countdown?

MCU Countdown has the lower median latency in our checks — Imgur responds in 412 ms versus MCU Countdown at 388 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Imgur and MCU Countdown need an API key?

MCU Countdown needs no key, while Imgur requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for MCU Countdown first.

Can I call Imgur and MCU Countdown from the browser?

Only MCU Countdown is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Imgur needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Imgur and MCU Countdown free for commercial use?

Imgur has unclear commercial terms, and MCU Countdown has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.