IMDbOT vs Screenshotlayer

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d25.5%100%
Uptime · 30d0.0%100%
P50 · ms1208458
P95 · ms17392228
Authnonenone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

IMDbOT vs Screenshotlayer: common questions

Which is more reliable, IMDbOT or Screenshotlayer?

On our scheduled checks, Screenshotlayer leads on measured uptime — IMDbOT at 25.5% versus Screenshotlayer at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, IMDbOT or Screenshotlayer?

Screenshotlayer has the lower median latency in our checks — IMDbOT responds in 1208 ms versus Screenshotlayer at 458 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do IMDbOT and Screenshotlayer need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — IMDbOT is callable with no signup, and Screenshotlayer is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call IMDbOT and Screenshotlayer from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call IMDbOT and Screenshotlayer from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are IMDbOT and Screenshotlayer free for commercial use?

IMDbOT has unclear commercial terms, and Screenshotlayer has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.